AIASC 360: AI System Property, Plant, and Equipment
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbe75/dbe758f7b3923051297d4c8d08875505089b7384" alt="broken image"
Purpose and Scope:
This document offers guidelines for recognizing, measuring, and presenting property, plant, and equipment (PPE) specifically tailored for AI operations. It covers tangible assets used in the production, development, or support of AI systems over multiple periods.
1. Principle of Asset Identification:
- Identify and classify PPE related to AI, such as specialized servers, AI hardware accelerators, and dedicated AI research facilities.
2. Principle of Initial Recognition:
- Recognize AI-related PPE at cost, encompassing all expenditures directly attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition.
3. Principle of Subsequent Measurement:
- Measure AI PPE at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses, with provisions for revaluation.
4. Principle of Depreciation:
- Systematically depreciate the cost of AI PPE over its expected useful life, considering salvage value.
5. Principle of Component Approach:
- If parts of an AI PPE item have different useful lives, depreciate them separately, employing a component-based approach.
6. Principle of Impairment Evaluation:
- Regularly assess AI PPE for impairment, ensuring their carrying value doesn't exceed their recoverable amount.
7. Principle of Disclosure:
- Transparently disclose the measurement bases, depreciation methods, useful lives, and other relevant details about AI PPE.
8. Principle of Derecognition:
- Derecognize AI PPE when they are disposed of or no longer expected to provide economic benefits, recognizing any resulting gain or loss.
Updates and Amendments:The AIASC 360 guidelines will be periodically reviewed and updated to consider advancements in AI technology, evolving practices in recognizing and measuring PPE, and feedback from stakeholders and the public.
Note: This is a fictional representation and does not represent any real-world standard for AI. The development of such standards would involve extensive consultations with experts, stakeholders, and the public. Fictional representations simplify complex AI concepts, stimulate discussion, envision future scenarios, highlight ethical considerations, encourage creativity, bridge knowledge gaps, and set benchmarks for debate in fields like accounting.