AIASC 340: AI System Deferred Costs
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b16d/0b16d92d6fff2d40486c301bcbea5da314c3e3fb" alt="broken image"
Purpose and Scope:
This document offers guidelines for recognizing, measuring, and presenting costs related to AI operations that are deferred to be recognized as expenses in future periods. This ensures that stakeholders understand the financial implications of investments in AI that will yield benefits over multiple periods.
1. Principle of Cost Identification:
- Clearly identify and classify costs directly attributable to AI operations that are expected to provide future economic benefits.
2. Principle of Initial Recognition:
- Recognize AI deferred costs as assets when it's probable that they will provide future economic benefits and can be measured reliably.
3. Principle of Amortization:
- Systematically amortize the deferred AI costs over the periods in which the related benefits are expected to be realized.
4. Principle of Impairment Evaluation:
- Regularly evaluate deferred AI costs for impairment, and if their carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, recognize an impairment loss.
5. Principle of Disclosure:
- Transparently disclose the nature and amount of deferred AI costs, the periods over which they will be amortized, and any impairment losses recognized.
6. Principle of Cost Recovery:
- Detail the expected manner of recovery of deferred AI costs, whether through the sale of AI products, services, or other means.
7. Principle of Changes in Estimates:
- If there are changes in the expected pattern of economic benefits or the period of benefit, adjust the amortization period or method accordingly.
8. Principle of Derecognition:
- Derecognize deferred AI costs when they are either realized as an expense or no longer expected to provide economic benefits.
Updates and Amendments:The AIASC 340 guidelines will be periodically reviewed and updated to consider advancements in AI technology, evolving financial practices in AI operations, and feedback from stakeholders and the public.
Note: This is a fictional representation and does not represent any real-world standard for AI. The development of such standards would involve extensive consultations with experts, stakeholders, and the public. Fictional representations simplify complex AI concepts, stimulate discussion, envision future scenarios, highlight ethical considerations, encourage creativity, bridge knowledge gaps, and set benchmarks for debate in fields like accounting.